Case Reports
Case 1: D.K., a 35 year old female presented to our hospital at 29
weeks of gestation during an otherwise unremarkable pregnancy with a
complaint of right flank discomfort. Renal ultrasound demonstrated marked
right unilateral hydronephrosis, but did not elucidate the site of obstruction.
A limited "one shot" intravenous pyelogram (IVP) was performed, demonstrating
a typical appearance of ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction (Figure
1). A complete history revealed that one year earlier, her identical
twin sister (M.B.) had also presented as an out patient to our facility
with similar complaints. Her evaluation revealed a diagnosis of ipsilateral
UPJ obstruction (Figure 2). She underwent an uncomplicated dismembered
pyeloplasty, revealing evidence of a stenotic segment at the UPJ as
the cause of the obstruction. No evidence of a crossing lower pole vessel
was identified. At this time, D.K. has not undergone surgical intervention.
Case 2: A 43 year old woman presented to her primary care physician
complaining of back pain. An IVP was performed, demonstrating a normal
left kidney and absence of the right kidney (Figure 3). There was no
past history of urologic disease or surgery. When informed of the result,
the woman stated that she had not been previously aware that she only
had one kidney, and wondered whether her identical twin sister might
be similarly affected. One week later, the twin sister was evaluated
with an IVP, demonstrating unilateral absence of the right kidney, and
a solitary left kidney almost identical in appearance to that of her
sibling (figure 4).
Discussion
Many reports in the literature discussing congenital
urologic pathology in twins focus on the pediatric population. In a
summary by McCandless et. al. (1) urethral valves and reflux accounted
for the majority of cases. Very few reports document the occurrence
of ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction (1,2). UPJ obstruction is
almost always congenital in origin. A variety of problems are thought
to be causative, including such extrinsic factors as crossing lower
pole renal vasculature, adhesive bands, insertion of the ureter into
a high position on the renal pelvis (preventing dependent drainage),
as well as intrinsic ureteral problems such as deficient musculature
or mucosal folds. In the era of pre-natal ultrasonography, many cases
of UPJ obstruction are detected antenatally, thus allowing for the consideration
of early intervention. In practice, however, an adult will present from
time to time with a previously undiagnosed UPJ obstruction. In some
cases, a careful history may suggest some of the typical historical
features, such as pain with diuresis (e.g. after consumption of alcohol
or caffeine) or a history of febrile urinary tract infections, but this
is not always the case. Following the initial diagnosis, most patients
will undergo some type of renal functional and anatomic study, allowing
decisions to be made on the type of intervention (nephrectomy versus
reconstruction). In the past decade, the development of many types of
"minimally invasive" antegrade and retrograde endopyelotomy techniques
have been developed, allowing selected patients to avoid the traditional
open pyeloplasty. Unilateral renal agenesis in the absence of other
anomalies is not particularly rare, but reports of the incidence of
this condition in twins is lacking. Most affected individuals with a
normal solitary renal unit will have no functional limitations, and
therefore may not be detected unless they undergo body imaging (often
for some other reason). A paucity of cases in the literature focus on
the relatives of index patients presenting with bilateral renal agenesis,
and of these, only a few were noted to have siblings with unilateral
agenesis (summarized in Carter et. al (3). Of the cases of ("probably
monozygotic") twins reported in this large survey, only one sibling
of an index patient had a form of unilateral renal agenesis (3). These
two adult cases point out that similar developmental anomalies may develop
in twins. Based on these experiences, we believe that the identical
twin siblings of adult individuals presenting with (likely) congenital
urinary tract abnormalities should be offered screening. This has been
suggested in the pediatric population (2). As ultrasonography provides
a non-invasive, risk free assessment of the number and architecture
of the renal units, we suggest that this should be the imaging study
of choice.
|
Figure 1
Excretory phase of intravenous "one shot" pyelography demonstrating
appearance of obstructed renal pelvis. Note intrauterine fetal
bony elements representing third trimester pregnancy.
|
|
Figure 2
Excretory phase of intravenous pyelography demonstrating obstruction
at the ureteropelvic junction. This patient is the identical twin
of the patient shown in Figure 1.
|
|
Figure 3
Index patient, demonstrating unilateral absence of right kidney.
|
|
|
Figure 4
Identical twin sister of patient shown in Figure 3, demonstrating
ipsilateral absence of right kidney. Note partial duplication
of ureter.
|
References
| 1. |
McCandless SE, Uehling D, Friedman AL:
Urinary Tract Malformations in Identical Twins. J Urol, 146:145-147,
1991. |
| 2. |
Sidebottom RA, Sadlowski RW: Bilateral
Ureteropelvic Junction Obstructions in Newborn Identical Twins.
Urology, 24:379-381, 1984. |
| 3. |
Carter CO, Evans K, Pescia G: A Family
Study of Renal Agenesis. J Med Genet, 16:176-188, 1979. |
|